![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
The formatting is crappy but I enjoyed this little puzzle in my new textbook. It is 'an historical event'. I got it after a few minutes and found it a really good way to get me thinking about what could cause this mortality pattern. I expect someone will get it quickly but if not, I'll post the answer tomorrow.
EDIT: You all know what it is... If you're a bit sunk just ask for the answer in the comments.
BTW I'm reading this text book (Webb and Bain) for fun after reading Ghost Map about John Snow's work. The first chapter has me hooked.
EDIT: You all know what it is... If you're a bit sunk just ask for the answer in the comments.
ADULT MALES | ADULT FEMALES | CHILDREN | TOTAL | |||||
Class/Socio Econom. Status | TOTAL | % Dead | TOTAL | % Dead | TOTAL | % Dead | TOTAL | % Dead |
High | 175 | 67.4 | 144 | 2.8 | 6 | 0 | 325 | 37.5 |
Medium | 168 | 91.7 | 93 | 14 | 24 | 0 | 285 | 58.6 |
Low | 462 | 83.8 | 165 | 53.9 | 79 | 65.8 | 706 | 74.8 |
Other | 885 | 78.3 | 23 | 13 | 0 | 0 | 908 | 76.7 |
TOTAL | 1690 | 80 | 425 | 25.6 | 109 | 47.7 | 2224 | 68 |
BTW I'm reading this text book (Webb and Bain) for fun after reading Ghost Map about John Snow's work. The first chapter has me hooked.
no subject
Date: 2015-03-14 11:34 pm (UTC)Got it - it took a while though, and several blind alleys. Fascinating.
no subject
Date: 2015-03-15 12:21 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2015-03-15 09:12 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2015-03-15 09:27 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2015-03-15 10:25 am (UTC)What delayed me slightly was misinterpreting the "% dead" column as being that that subset comprised that percentage of the dead, rather than that percentage of that subset died. When the figures signally failed to add up, I retraced my steps and guessed within seconds.
Overall, an illuminating view on how one event is so prominent.
no subject
Date: 2015-03-15 10:34 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2015-03-15 11:11 pm (UTC)